RIght. This is the post I hoped never to have to write.
Dr Who is rubbish.
I have written about bad CPR in films and on television before, both James Bond and Martha Jones have been on the receiving end of my withering criticism before now. Those examples were heroic compared to the third episode of the new series of Dr Who, which contains one of the worst examples of CPR ever presented on screen.
Amy Pond is trying to revive her husband, who has drowned (fell off a pirate ship). Let me just remind everyone that CPR for adults is taught in a relatively standard way all around the world. The best evidence suggests that a ratio of 30 compressions to 2 breaths is the most effective. And you carry on until help arrives, or you are exhausted. Amy utilises a ratio that averages out at 7:1. She performs the cycle six times, then has a little rest, at which point Rory coughs and wakes up. Ten minutes later he is in a dressing gown and popping off to bed.
Admittedly Amy confesses that she doesn't know CPR, so I am not blaiming her here. (Her husband is a nurse - why had he not shown her?) But I am distressed at the script writers and the directors and the producers and everyone who missed out on a golden opportunity to get it right and help save lives. People remember what they see. And most people have only ever seen CPR being given on telly. So why not put a teeny bit of effort in and show it correctly? That way, if someone has to perform CPR they stand a better chance of being effective because they have something to copy! Like this kid. Goodness knows why his parents let him watch Black Hawk Down when he was eight, although I bet they're glad now.
It is said that making some effort at CPR is better than nothing, but the camera angles in the Dr Who episode are all close ups of Amy's face and the mouth-to-mouth bit. At no point do they show a full shot of her pressing down on his chest. And you know what? That is the most important bit. Children are taught that when performing CPR on an adult, don't worry about the breaths, just push down hard and fast on the chest.
Grrr.
So what about the new series? Well, I really enjoyed the first two episodes, but I tend to agree with this statement ...
The very best thing about having a show with zero narrative accountability means you don't have to spend time making things fit together or avoid contradicting themselves: You can just do whatever you want, and then tell us that was how it was supposed to be all along. Just toss any old crazy awesome crap together -- space whales and Elizabeth X and scary face monsters and trapdoors and weird music and water falling in glasses and people wearing masks and time-travel ... but as long as you've also intercut three random scenes of other stuff happening, at the end of the day you can point to it and be like, "See? Brilliant."



Subscribe to this blog